- 在線時間
- 36 小時
- 最後登錄
- 15-1-9
- 國民生產力
- 1
- 附加生產力
- 108
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 03-7-18
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 80
- 主題
- 10
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 189
- UID
- 12330
 
|
Re: "稚言治語"信箱...
To : 大臣
咳到瞓唔箸，睇到呢個題目，希望唔好kill post 啦。
直到今天，Dr. Chan 發表了2篇文章，Dr. Chan 教識我哋『香港』醫生的守則，然後唔見佢發言。
直到今天，稚言治語發表了1279篇文章。稚言治語讓我哋（最少有57位支持佢的家長）瞭解多D有關語言發展的各方面。如果稚言治語有誤導大家的話，相信一定逃不過大家的責備（請大臣不要敏感，我不是指Dr.Chan 或其他言語治療師）在資訊發達的今天，為人父母的我們，都可從很多地方獲得知識，識分對錯嘅。
在BK Forum 裡，我們透過發言，透過各位回應，讓我們知道我們不是孤單的。
露骨D講，如果稚言治語因此得益，抵佢賺嘅。（我個仔從無接受任何言語治療，我亦不是從事相關行業）
我無全部睇過稚言治語發表的1279篇文章，如果佢有Hard Sell 佢自已嘅話，齋Delete 嗰D文章吧。唔好全部都Delete 晒好唔好。
仔女有因難要克服時，作為父母的，除了四處尋求解決方法去支持仔女的同時，都需要別人的支持的。三唔識七的人的一句說話、一個意見，嗰一刻，可能就像久旱甘露般，令父母找到繼續支持下去的力量。請唔好連呢滴水都攞走埋。
各位有關人仕唔駛擔心，稚言治語講一句我地唔會信到十足嘅，我地會分析架啦，放心啦。得罪講句，如果有D家長，人地講乜都信到十足，佢地都唔識嚟BK、唔會緊張帶仔女去搵醫生解決問題架。
（一己私心）如果有其他專業人士好似稚言治語咁得閒無事做，鐘意上嚟"指指點點"我地，即使你有私心（衰D講句，我唔介意架，最緊要真係有心、有料，唔係同我地講D乜嘢理念、乜嘢守則）太深嘅嘢呢到唔啱發表架。呢到D C9（司奶）鐘意D有Heart 嘅。
大臣，我覺得BK (baby kingdom) 是同類全港最好、最成功的網站，希望BK 可以做到『店大欺客』，比D "Guts" 出嚟，有你講，由你話事，唔好為一D(灰色地帶)的投訴，抹掉了我們呢一細滴嘅甘露、等我地有個聚集的地方。
Dr.Chan 寫道:
Dear Miss Sung,
how to justify what is good quality?
Do you still remember that you have replied the following enquires that:
1. doctors are not expert in child language, ST should be the expert.
2. HA speech therapist deal with adults in ward and thus not so good as ST in special schools
How do you justify your wordings?
From a paediatrician perspective, doctors do have their expertise in child development, not just language, but also motor, cognitive, emotion......
I strongly disappointed at your argument with other speech therapists. I do believe the other two are really professional. Of course, information and skills should be shared to public, not 把知識和言論壟斷. However, don't you mislead the readers ?
Last year, The Hong Kong Association of Speech Therapists send a letter to the Child Development and Paediatrician Council and make mistake. This year you are also put yourself at risk (or already have?) in professional ethics issue.
Doctors can also do the Reynell Developmental Language Skills assessment!!!!!!
Thus,
I strongly agree the other speech therapists opinion that parents should bring their child to receive proper assessment instead of just asking question in Miss Sung self promoting Letter Box.
Miss Sung, If you are not self promoting, why do you need to disclose your backgroud, information, interview on newspaper, identity....
Yet, I do agree with Dr. T that you have declared that you haven't and won't disclose you identity to avoid the conflict of interest.
Again, Miss Sung, Do you know what is professional ethics? Do you know why doctors won't answer in details for the enquires in internet? I can only see your reply and your argument is misleading BK parents. Well, I am quite doubt.....
Dear BK parents,
Do bring your child to professional or doctors for proper assessment and therapy, not just asking question here !
Dr. Chan  |
|
發表於 05-12-14 04:06
