- 在線時間
- 23 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-7-7
- 國民生產力
- 25
- 附加生產力
- 250
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-8-22
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 358
- 主題
- 32
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 633
- UID
- 153857
|
原帖由 gingerale 於 09-10-12 17:50 發表
It is true that we get to know a lot about our children during the process of profolio preparation.
However, it is unrealistic that any school would spend much time to digest the information in 2000 ...
I let my daughter go to all the extra-curricular activities simply because she has a lot of time after her morning class, and that she actually enjoys going. She is not taking piano lessons because she doesn't like practising. So I don't want to force her to practise. But she's taking swimming lessons all year round because it actually improves her health. None of the activities was meant to be put in the portfolio in the first place.
But then, I was grateful to have something to put in the portfolio when I needed to make one. And on some of the application forms, I have to fill out what kind of awards and certificates my daughter has.
My daughter was chosen by her kindergarten to enter a Putonghua competition when she was in K1. And she got a certificate for being in the finals. Of course, I put that down in the portfolio.
I don't know how much time a school actually uses to go through all the portfolio. My daughter was always asked questions in Putonghua during interviews, which I guess the school might try to "verify" the truthfulness of the info that I put down. She said that not all the children were not asked questions in Putonghua.
If anyone puts false info or cert in the portfolio, wouldn't they have to tell their kids to lie at the same time?
[ 本帖最後由 rachncurtsmom 於 09-10-12 20:43 編輯 ] |
|